President Bill Clintons Impeachment :: William Jefferson Clinton Essays

Clintons ImpeachmentIn 1998 the American public was riveted by headlines detailing the private sexual encounters of our death chair and a White House employee. For the first time in US history, a sitting president had every aspect of his own(prenominal) life presented to the public for debate. As the smoke cleared, discussions began to question what turn off had allowed the media to print much(prenominal) sordid details about our top elected official. Suddenly, our Commander in Chiefs private life warranted front-page news. What gave us the right to invade his privacy? The theories presented to swear out this question blame everything from technology to a lack of morality. Many looking at the information age has allowed the public such a high score of exposure to headline news-bites that the competition for an original, attention grabbing story has forced the media to calamus deeper to hold public interest. Others say the success of tabloid media in the new-made eigh ties and early nineties is to blame. They proved that scandal sells. Political analysts commit Clinton can only blame himself. During his first campaign he answered personal questions openly and with amusement. Even an extrinsic question about his choice of underclothing was acceptable. GOP perishership would have us believe it is a conspiracy lead by the Republican Party in an attempt to gain visualise of the White House. Religious leaders think American morality has change posture so low that all this news of scandal has just get perverse entertainment. Journalists in an attempt to justify the story will entreat it is our right to know. It would be reasonable to assume that each of these factors contributed to the end result. It may be necessary to look into the history books to find the root fetch for this. We know from biographies write about former presidents that there were very some who can claim they had nothing to hide. In contrast with the curren t trend there was actually very little scandalous press written during their respective terms. Harry Truman was the harbinger of change. He almost lost his invoke for re-election when some of the countries most respected newspapers printed allegations, based mostly on rumor, that he was involved in the corrupt politics of Thomas Pendergast. This was a exhalation from the term of James Garfield in 1881.