Foreign Intervention Essay

underdeveloped nations be usually countries that lack stability, whether politically or financially. Intervention in frequently(prenominal) nations whitethorn prove to be helpful in such cases, as it may ensure an increased stability within the uncouth. This is much gather uped in developing nations, as stability is key to scotch prosperity. However, discourse in the interior affairs of another nation may undermine the countrys sovereignty, rendering contrary encumbrance undesir fitting, as it does to a greater extent harm than in effect(p) from the standpoint of the developing nation.Foreign handling in the form of pieceitarian c ar does more mature than harm, as it hastens the restoration of infrastructure and provides the citizens with the necessities to tide over difficult times. Natural disasters bewilder substantial damage to a country, with homes destroyed and lives lost. The pot involved are often rendered helpless. Developing nations in particular, may not be able to help much due to the lack of financial reserves.Humanitarian aid given in such times is desired and leave alone be of great help to the good deal, due to the relief provided in times of distress. An exercise would be Haiti, which was badly hit by an earthquake. International organizations such as the United Nations and Red Cross Foundation provided food and medical care, alleviating the blot in Haiti. Hence, humanitarian aid brings about many benefits, doing more good than harm.Developing nations embattled in internal turmoil may convey foreign intervention to restore political stability in the nation. inhibitory regimes such as that in Libya have way outed in brutality and oppression. The good deal are unable to stand up for themselves to contract a change. The people desire intervention, as they wish to be freed from tyrant rulers. Foreign intervention go forth aid the citizens in effecting a change that will mitigate their lives drastically.Furthermore, the political stability that results may restore economic prosperity in the nation, which was not achievable previously due to uncertainty and fear for the emerging by businesses. Political stability will reduce those fears and create a better environment for the economy to flourish. These benefits are far-reaching and prospicient-term, and are essential to the knowledge of the nation. Hence, foreignintervention in a developing nation does more good than harm.The intervention in another nations internal affairs may undermine national sovereignty, which is an important attribute of neo states today. Sovereignty is of great significance, and no country will willingly throw overboard foreign nations to infringe on their sovereignty. Foreign intervention may result in negative repercussions, such as the strain on multinational relations. This is seen by Greeces anger over perceived intervention in their internal affairs by Germany during the Eurozone crisis. Strained relations between countries inapplicable for both countries as it may lead to restricted trade, and in work on the loss of economic opportunities. Foreign intervention may lead to long lasting harmful impacts if relations do not improve, hence it does a significant amount of harm.Foreign intervention may serve as a tool in correcting the infringement of human rights, which will do good and justice to the people subjected to unfair treatment. The 1994 Rwanda genocide was an instance where human rights were compromised. The Hutus persecuted the Tutsis, and a coalition of states was prepared to put a stop to that. The intervention will help the Tutsi population escape such brutality and violence.The Tutsis will be able to live a life free of brutality, which will improve their physical well being and be able to lead a more peaceful life. Human rights should never be infringed as it is the basic rights that every human being should possess. Therefore, in cases where human rights are compromised, foreig n intervention is warranted and it will bring about more good than harm.In principle, it may seem that the harm outweighs the good if sovereignty, a all important(p) aspect of every nation, is infringed. However, it depends on the circumstances. The dire need for humanitarian aid, fulfilment of basic human rights and freedom from repressive regimes may surpass the need for sovereignty. It will not be harmful to have foreign intervention. Rather, the people in developing nations will experience many positive impacts, and the country may be able to develop further and prosper, hence foreign intervention does not do more harm than good.