A Case Study on Animal Testing Essay

Imagine a public where humans argon taken to laboratories and riseed on in a c solelyous manner. A world where mountain be injected with cutting drugs and chemicals that physically and mentally harm their bodies and their heart. If this scenario does non sound acceptable to act upon humans, then it surely piece of tailnot be practiced for sentient beings. Right now in the world thousands of tools atomic number 18 experiencing this, and it most contumaciously is not fair. sentient being examen should be stopped because it is not further cruel, unless un required since there are alternative examen methods and animal rights.See more Examples of satire in adventures of huckfinn essayThe statistics of animal exam reflect the cruel and inhumane behavior that it exercises. Tests some periods require thousands of animals and raft last for one month or even an animals entire life. (Watson, 2009, Animal interrogation p.32) The tests affect the animals in a inexorable, harsh manner that could result in death. In fact 50% of all animals that are tested on end up dying. (Pros and Cons of Animal interrogatory 2013, para. 2) the States is one of the countries that tests on animals most commonly. Government facilities in America that subject to animal testing are the Environmental Protection Agency, provender and Drug Administration, the Department of Transportation, National Toxicology Program, and the Department of Agriculture. But surprisingly these tests arent required by law in America. (Peta, Animal Testing hundred and one, para. 3) Over 100 million animals suffer each year and $1 million is spent on experiments and equipment for testing. Animal testing uses 40% of all research funding from the U.S. National Institute of Health. (Watson, 2009, Animal Testing p.9) It is necessary that the statistics of animal testing are revealed to those who shit been misinformed or undereducated of the issue.The pitiful methods of testing that are used pre sently have shown to be brutal and potent. The experiments involve the usage of rats, birds, guineapigs, cats, monkeys, goats, rabbits, fish, mice, and dogs. (Vivisection, 6th ed., p.1, 2013) The experiments are mainly for the utilization of cosmetics, medicine, household cleaners. A lethal poisoning test invented around the time of World War Iin which animals are force-fed increasing doses of a chemical until they dieis still the single most common animal test in use today. Examples of the drugs and chemicals that are used on the creatures are penicillin, morphine, and aspirin- all of which have the potential to kill the animals. The animals are burned, shocked, isolated, forcibly restrained, habituate to drugs, and receive brain damage. (Edwards, 2011, Animal Testing)The methods of testing are epidermic penetration, eye irritancy, carcinogenicity. acute toxicity, reproductive and DEV toxicity, neurotoxity, skin corrosivity/irritation, ecotoxicity, and pyrogeniaty. (Vivisection, 6th ed., p.1, 2013) Also, the conditions in the laboratories are unsanitary and horrible for living. The animals are deprived of food and water, their waste is not kept after, and they are closely packed in small cages heedless of their state of health. The worst part is that the animals are given no hurting killers of put under anesthesia, therefore they are forced to suffer for incalculable hours. This way of so-called science is extremely atrocious to the lives of animals, and needs to be stopped for good.The methods of animal testing that are generally used in America are unnecessary since there are alternative methods of testing. Ric unenviable Klausner, creator head of the National Cancer Institute, once said, We have cured mice of pubic louse for decades and it simply didnt work in humans (Pros and Cons of Animal Testing 2013, para. 5) Basically what Klausner is saying is that it is hard to fix humane issues by testing on animals. The results will usually come out as wide or unreliable. The differences betwixt a human be and an animal body are very distinct. There are animatic, metabolic, and cellular difference between the two. There are endless alternative options to replace the merciless surround of regular animal testing. Scientists can study cell cultures by use computer modeling, create artificial human skin, use Vitro testing, and even test on human volunteers These new methods harm no living creatures and are becoming increasingly popular. (Peta, Animal Testing 101, para. 6) For example,the makers of botox have begun to run tests on cells in a lab dish rather of on live animals. Also, it was found that sunscreen can be tested on humans and brings results that are accurate 93% of the time. It is time to give up animal testing into a relic of the past, because better methods exist that are efficient.Lastly, animals deserve to live their lives free from suffering and exploitation. Animals rights are just as equal to the rights that hum ans possess. All animals have the ability to suffer in the same way and to the same degree that humans do. They feel pain, pleasure, fear, frustration, loneliness, and maternal love. Animals also show loyalty, and communicate with each other. (Animal Rights Movement 2001, Animal Rights section) Supporters of animal rights believe that animals have an inherent wortha appreciate completely separate from their usefulness to humans. Animals do not have a voice, so therefore, humans are their voice. Most animal rights activists stick to the belief that animals should be free to do as they please, which is not a hard task to accomplish. It is very easy to leave animals where they belong, and let them live their life naturally and without human interference. Animals should be as free as people to roam about and do their animal things unmolested and restrained by humans. So that is exactly what needs to be done. Humans need to encounter that animals should have basic rights the right to not be tortured, neglected or killed needlessly.Overall, animal testing can be described as just wrong. Animal testing should be stopped because it is not only cruel, but unnecessary since there are other testing options and animals have rights. Animals rarely serve as good models for the human body therefore animal experimenters are simply wasting the innocent lives of animals. The animals undergo poisoning, shocking, burning, and even death. These methods can be avoided because there are alternative options, so animal testing can be deemed as unneeded and inefficient. In conclusion, animal testing should be eliminated because it violates animals rights, it causes pain and suffering to the experimental animals, and other means of testing product toxicity are available.